Review can't scale forever
Teams are producing content across more channels, while reviewing every routine requirement by hand takes time.
Introducing SCAYT · Early access
Standard and Content Assurance You Trust
Content guardrails inside your publishing workflow
Your content moves fast. Your standards still matter. SCAYT is an emerging way to check human- and AI-generated content against the rules your organization defines—inside the workflows your teams already use.
Built on WebSpellChecker's embedded language technology
Public information / draft
Community services update
Our department shall provide an update on the application process.
If you need assistance, please refer to the guidance below.
SCAYT 2 findings
Preferred wording
Consider “must” instead of “shall”
Needs reviewRequired information
Check guidance link and contact details
Needs reviewRules your organization controls
A new product direction from an established language-technology company.
10+Years operating
1,000+Paying orgs worldwide
30KFree-tier
20B+Words / month (SaaS)
The challenge
More content. More ways for important details to slip through.
Whether a person writes the first draft or an AI assistant does, the organization is still responsible for what it publishes.
Standards live in different places
Style guides, preferred terminology, internal policies, and publishing requirements are often disconnected from the writing tools.
Errors become public problems
Missed language or policy requirements can trigger rework, inconsistent communications, and loss of confidence.
Who it's for
Does your team publish content that has to follow a rulebook?
SCAYT is being explored for teams that need consistent checks before content goes public. Find the use case that looks most like yours.
Make public information easier to follow.
Explore checks for agency terminology, plain-language conventions, and required content in notices or service guidance.
Protect editorial consistency as volume grows.
Explore preferred terminology, style conventions, and documented review checkpoints within report production.
Check communications against defined rules.
Explore required disclosures, prohibited wording, and review escalation for business-critical content.
The approach
One workflow. Your standards. Clear next steps.
SCAYT is being designed as a configurable assurance layer, not another writing destination or generic AI chatbot.
01 / CONFIGURE
Define what matters
Set preferred terms, style conventions, required wording, and review criteria around your organization's content policies.
02 / CHECK
Review content in context
Apply checks where people write or manage content, with explanations that connect findings to relevant requirements.
03 / DECIDE
Resolve or escalate
Help authors address findings and route judgment-heavy cases to people responsible for final approval.
We're validating this workflow with prospective customers. The examples below illustrate the intended experience; advanced policy and approval capabilities are not presented as generally available today.
Explore the concept
Interactive concept previewSee how one document becomes ready for review.
See how SCAYT could flag an AI-generated paragraph, identify an internal-policy violation, and route a draft for review. Choose a highlighted passage to inspect the finding.
Community services notice
Review pending
Resolve or route the example findings before a human editor makes the final decision.
DraftSCAYT checksHuman approval
3 findings need attention
Illustrative workflow. The checks, content, and actions are predetermined for demonstration. No uploaded text or automated compliance analysis is performed in this preview.
Why SCAYT
Built for organizations with their own rulebook.
Generic writing assistance helps improve a sentence. Enterprise content assurance needs to reflect how your team works, what it must check, and when a person needs to decide.
Your rules, not generic advice
Envisioned around configurable terminology, language, and content requirements.
Designed to fit your tools
Builds on a long-standing foundation of embedding proofreading in editors and applications.
Human decisions stay visible
Proposed review workflows distinguish items to address from those needing expert judgment.
Deployment choices matter
Existing WProofreader supports cloud and self-hosted setups. SCAYT's advanced processing scope will be evaluated per pilot.
From an established foundation
New product ambition. A decade of experience building embedded language tools.
SCAYT is a proposed evolution of WebSpellChecker's proven text-checking foundation. For investors and ecosystem partners, we're open to conversations about the market opportunity, design partnerships, and the next phase of the product.
Questions worth asking
Curious? So are we.
We're developing this product with market feedback, and we want to be clear about the vision and current stage.
Is SCAYT available today?
SCAYT is an early-stage product concept being validated through conversations and pilot exploration. It builds on WebSpellChecker's existing language technology, but the broader policy-checking and approval experience shown here is illustrative and subject to development.
Does SCAYT guarantee regulatory compliance?
No. The proposed solution is intended to help teams check content against requirements they configure and make review more consistent. It isn't legal advice, a compliance certification, or a substitute for expert and human oversight.
Can our content stay inside our infrastructure?
Existing WProofreader technology supports self-hosted deployment. For SCAYT, the available deployment model and which advanced checks can run entirely within an approved environment will need to be confirmed for each pilot. We won't assume every AI-assisted feature is local.
Will this work with our CMS or editor?
WebSpellChecker technology already integrates with different editors and applications. SCAYT's pilot integrations will be selected based on participating organizations' workflows and requirements. Tell us your platform when you get in touch.
How does pricing work?
Commercial packaging and pricing for SCAYT are still being validated. A pilot discussion can help determine scope, workflows, deployment needs, and how you would measure value before discussing a commercial proposal.
What would trustworthy publishing look like for your team?
Help shape SCAYT. Tell us which checks, workflows, and outcomes would make it worth using.